...came across this entry today over at F-Secure's blog,it got me into thinking...
http://www.f-secure.com/weblog/archives/00001378.htmlThe numbers,in short:
End of 2006 -> 250000 malware detections
End of 2007 -> 500000 ...
12 Feb 2008 -> 560000 ...
Here's also an older entry in McAfee's blog for convenience...
http://www.avertlabs.com/research/blog/?p=49Allow me to fill the rest of numbers...again,in short:
Sep 2004 -> 100000 ...
July 2006 -> 200000 ...
Aug 2007 -> 300000 ...
12 Feb 2008 -> 375000 ...
...not interested in comparing the two aformentioned products,
this would be like comparing...fruits with vegetables:in the most simplistic form of thinking,
someone could even suggest that the numbers themselves prove,
that they use completely different underlying mechanisms/heuristics and sigs counting etc.
Not gonna delve into this more,as it's something already discussed...
So,if I can call it this way...what's the moral of the story?
Nothing more or less than what the above AV researchers already presented in their blogs...
that no matter the case,statistics over time comes to the same conclusion:
malware development/spreading has been doubled in less than 2 years,
and continues to grow this way unfortunately....
